July 26, 2021

Swiss refuse to ban synthetic pesticides

It is an unambiguous rejection. Swiss voters largely refused, Sunday, June 13, to ban synthetic pesticides. However, they agreed to step up police measures against terrorism, despite criticism from the UN and human rights defenders.

No major country has so far banned synthetic pesticides. Elsewhere in the world, Bhutan announced a few years ago that it wanted to become the first country in the world to make a living from agriculture « 100 % bio ». The Swiss refused on Sunday to engage their country – which is home to one of the largest manufacturers of plant protection products, the Basel group Syngenta, acquired in 2017 by the Chinese giant ChemChina – on this path.

“It is a choice of reason and pragmatism, it is a choice which guarantees the future of our agriculture and which ensures the food security of our country. This double no gives the agricultural world the opportunity to pursue its transition reforms towards more sustainable production ”, reacted the Swiss President, Guy Parmelin, in a press conference.

Article reserved for our subscribers Read also The Swiss must speak out on climate and environmental issues

A canton in favor of the ban

A first text, which called for the prohibition of synthetic pesticides within ten years, as well as any import of foodstuffs produced abroad using these products or containing them, was rejected at 60, 56%, according to final results.

Fiercely fought in the countryside, the ban, supported by environmentalists and the left, was also rejected in the cities of Geneva and Friborg. The ” Yes “ won only in the canton of Basel-Stadt – where Syngenta has its headquarters. The committee that presented the text called on the government after the vote to “Regularly test the population to detect pesticide residues”.

Another initiative – 60.68% rejected – provided for the Swiss Confederation’s subsidies to farmers to be paid only to farms that do not use pesticides, ban the preventive or regular use of antibiotics and are able to feed their animals with the fodder they produce themselves.

Read also: Democracy otherwise. 3 | 6: Citizen voting, this Swiss exception

Increased means of police surveillance

Voters were also 56.58% in support of the law on police measures to combat terrorism, giving the police the means to act more easily as a preventive measure in the face of a “Potential terrorist”. The police will be able to better monitor them, limit their movements and force them to participate in interviews, from the age of 12. From the age of 15, people can be placed under house arrest for nine months, with the approval of a court.

Left-wing opponents of the law believe that it does not respect fundamental rights, endangering the country’s heritage in this area. The UN and several legal experts and human rights defenders had also cried out in danger. “Switzerland will now have the world’s least professional, ineffective and dangerous anti-terrorism law – a major embarrassment for Switzerland as a rule of law”UN Rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer told Agence France-Presse (AFP) after the vote.

Article reserved for our subscribers Read also Ignazio Cassis: “Switzerland refuses to concede any relinquishment of sovereignty over free movement”

“With this law, Switzerland is giving itself an imprecise definition of terrorism which opens the door to police arbitrariness. Spreading fear with political intent will already be considered terrorism, even if no threat of violent act is established ”, lamented Patrick Walder, campaign director at Amnesty International Switzerland.

The government ensures that fundamental rights will be guaranteed and argues that de-radicalization programs are insufficient for some people. Even though Switzerland was spared the jihadist attacks that hit Europe, the threat remains “High” according to the authorities, who argued that“In 2020 two knife attacks, probably terrorist motivations, took place”, in Morges and Lugano.

No desire to reduce pollution

The Swiss, on the other hand, narrowly rejected, by 51.59%, the law aiming to further reduce CO2 emissions by 2030. The law provided in particular to increase the tax on fuel oil and natural gas, as well as that the introduction of a tax on airline tickets departing from Switzerland.

“Not going out of the ballot today is not a no to climate protection. (…) Many people want to strengthen climate protection, but not in this way ”, declared during the same press conference the Minister of Environment and Energy. “Climate change remains urgent, which is why we must move forward and find a path very quickly”.

For WWF, “The winners of today’s vote will be held to account tomorrow. Switzerland is already causing climate damage for nearly 20 billion francs per year ”. Another text put to the vote, the Covid law, giving the government additional powers to fight the epidemic and mitigate its effects on society and the economy, obtained the support of 60.21% of voters.

Article reserved for our subscribers Read also The commitments of States “very far” from responding to the climate crisis

The world